It must be pretty obvious by now that not much is happening with regards to me making a film. I've spent April and May trying to raise finance and procrastinating because I don't really know how.
I emailed a number of funders, searched the internet for hours even had a couple of hopeful conversations with people and I finally wrote off to some trusts, only with one of which is there the slightest slimest chance of me getting some money, which naturally gets smaller every day that I don't hear from them although their official "Forget about it now" date is the end of June.
I had this idea about advertising some local companies, putting them on the film credits as sponsors, getting the film played at some local cinemas to make this worth their while. Of course to approach sponsors I'd need a marketing pack so what would go in that? And then who should I approach? Ultimately it's tough going solo with no one to bounce ideas off or fill in the huge gaps in your knowledge and experience. In the end I decided I just don't have the skills at this point in my life, sad but true. I think to be fair to myself not having the time has been a big factor also. I work 2.5 days a week and during April and May I was running some script writing workshops in a theatre school for a few weekends and then there's been the continuing journey of finding money to get me back to university. Perhaps it wasn't just time but energy and focus and there just wasn't enough to go around. Still at least I tried... and someone at least one person liked my script enough to offer to direct it :) thanks Abbe I appreciate that.
We'll see what happens, if I do or don't get into university - it's kind of looking 50/50 at the moment could go either way. If I don't then maybe I will get to make the film afterall although if I do does that mean ultimately I get to make a lot more films in the future? I think I might keep the blog open and do some film reviews from time to time, keep my writing hand in as it were. So I guess I'll be keeping you posted.... Next!
Saturday, 29 May 2010
Saturday, 3 April 2010
Adverts and Disappointments
I realise it's been a while since I wrote anything about this film I'm supposed to be making. The truth is I haven't done an awful lot recently.
The last month has been disappointing to be honest. I found out I wasn't going to get the final benefit payment I thought they'd squeeze through for me after I started a job - that could have gone towards the budget. Then the tax man bled me dry in my first pay packet, any extra there would also have been money towards the film. Then to top it off, due to family commitments I missed the entire industry weekend at Bradford Film Festival somewhere I could have made important connections and possibly opened funding doors. I've had to seriously consider whether this is something I should really be pursuing right now.
There are plenty of reasons not to do this: I'm going to be really busy over the next 6 weeks or so using my free half of the week to hold workshops at the theatre school (the 2nd job I was offered back in February). I'm currently on my third cold since December and I wonder if I'm already over doing it with activity. Then there's the money. Not having any isn't so much the problem, the issue is that there's something more important I should be raising it for. I've recently accepted an offer from Edinburgh Napier university to do an MA in Screen Project Development starting this September and in order to do the course I need to save at least 1K myself and then get some funding for a couple more before I even think about putting money into a short film - crazy idea!
Ofcourse it's usual to apply for funding for a masters and no one funds a film entirely out of their own pocket, you never do that as a film maker it's just too much risk but in both cases I need a good wad to put on the table to ensure some kind of 'match funding'.
Then there's the fact that if I start uni in September I'm left with a very tight schedule in which to make the film. You can't just think about raising finance and shooting it either you have to allow for editing and exhibiting the film otherwise what's the point of doing it in the first place...
All in all I'm very close to throwing in the towel right now, it certainly seems the 'sensible' thing to do. I'll let you know what I decide...
You may be wondering why google adverts have suddenly appeared all over my page. It seems like a sell out but as this whole blog is about me raising finance I reckoned it would be daft not to take them up on their offer :) I've no idea how much I get per click, probably a percentage of a penny but if you happen to be reading this...go on give them a click...you'll be helping me out :) thank you x.
BTW my friend with the brain tumour had his operation and it went really well. He's going to have to have some radiotherapy but that was pretty much expected. The main thing is it's definitely only a grade 2 tumour, so prognosis pretty positive and they got out at least 90% of it during the operation. It's nice to have some positive news to end with :)
The last month has been disappointing to be honest. I found out I wasn't going to get the final benefit payment I thought they'd squeeze through for me after I started a job - that could have gone towards the budget. Then the tax man bled me dry in my first pay packet, any extra there would also have been money towards the film. Then to top it off, due to family commitments I missed the entire industry weekend at Bradford Film Festival somewhere I could have made important connections and possibly opened funding doors. I've had to seriously consider whether this is something I should really be pursuing right now.
There are plenty of reasons not to do this: I'm going to be really busy over the next 6 weeks or so using my free half of the week to hold workshops at the theatre school (the 2nd job I was offered back in February). I'm currently on my third cold since December and I wonder if I'm already over doing it with activity. Then there's the money. Not having any isn't so much the problem, the issue is that there's something more important I should be raising it for. I've recently accepted an offer from Edinburgh Napier university to do an MA in Screen Project Development starting this September and in order to do the course I need to save at least 1K myself and then get some funding for a couple more before I even think about putting money into a short film - crazy idea!
Ofcourse it's usual to apply for funding for a masters and no one funds a film entirely out of their own pocket, you never do that as a film maker it's just too much risk but in both cases I need a good wad to put on the table to ensure some kind of 'match funding'.
Then there's the fact that if I start uni in September I'm left with a very tight schedule in which to make the film. You can't just think about raising finance and shooting it either you have to allow for editing and exhibiting the film otherwise what's the point of doing it in the first place...
All in all I'm very close to throwing in the towel right now, it certainly seems the 'sensible' thing to do. I'll let you know what I decide...
You may be wondering why google adverts have suddenly appeared all over my page. It seems like a sell out but as this whole blog is about me raising finance I reckoned it would be daft not to take them up on their offer :) I've no idea how much I get per click, probably a percentage of a penny but if you happen to be reading this...go on give them a click...you'll be helping me out :) thank you x.
BTW my friend with the brain tumour had his operation and it went really well. He's going to have to have some radiotherapy but that was pretty much expected. The main thing is it's definitely only a grade 2 tumour, so prognosis pretty positive and they got out at least 90% of it during the operation. It's nice to have some positive news to end with :)
Monday, 29 March 2010
Alice in 3D Land
I watched Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland last night at the Imax in Bradford. I have to admit to being very behind when it comes to the latest 3D revolution, but maybe that's because the last one was so under whelming.
I went to an Imax in London years ago with my parents. Back then they were still handing out those awful cardboard glasses that you had to hold on with one hand during the film to stop them sliding off - and it wasn't even a film! We watched a series of still photos of historical New York. Many were taken from the top of sky scrapers and cranes so of course the 3D effect helped you feel the height a little bit more but it was all pretty dull.
Now suddenly this year everyone's been talking about Avatar and then it goes and wins a ton of oscars and I'm wondering if there's something I've missed. So I went to see Alice with an open mind yesterday.
The downsides first - of course it's more expensive, £9 at the Media Museum although the ticket seller was quick to tell me that most Imax's are £13 per full price adult. Still, you don't have to go to an Imax to see a 3D film. You do still have to wear the glasses though if you do go to an Imax, I soon discovered, but at least these days they're proper plastic ones and mine almost fitted well enough that I forgot I had them on.
The upsides - the film, of course had been made for 3D viewing and there were some great touches, if a little obviously laid on, like the March Hare's habit of throwing china right at you through the screen (actually made me flinch :). A number of times you watched Alice being chased from front on so that she was also running through the screen at you. Her fall through the rabit hole was pretty dramatic and any flying scene in 3D is always worth it's weight in extra entrance fees.
For those who've never experienced 3D, when you put the glasses on it's a little like you're suddenly watching a stage performance. Due to the added depth of the picture the action flows forward into the room as well as backwards behind the characters and there's less of a boundary between you and the picture. This definitely helps you to lose yourself in the action and adds to that suspension of disbelief feeling that we're all looking for when we go to see a film. I did find though, during the busiest action scenes that I actually got a bit dizzy and lost the thread a little, but maybe that's just me.
If you're expecting anything more dramatic and revolutionary than this though you'll be disappointed. It's good, but it's not all that. It adds to the general all round experience, as someone pointed out a bit like surround sound which we now take completely for granted; but are we going to simply expect it in future in the same way that we expect surround sound as an experience enhancer which we've got used to very quickly. Watching a film in 2D just won't cut it anymore, a bit like watching black and white when you're used to colour. I think it's quite likely that there'll be a generation of children who will grow up complaining that "2D is boring".
So does this mean that every film will have to include flying objects, chase scenes and heights, because one thing 3D can't do is enhance the plot? What about your ordinary romantic comedies, sure they don't need 3D but if everyone's doing it..? My question is, will the language of film, the way we read the screen change in order to allow for making the best of 3D? How about a film shot totally from a character's point of view? This isn't a new idea idea but it could work so much better in 3D. Maybe this time the revolution is really here. I just hope it means you can get your own glasses that actually fit!
I went to an Imax in London years ago with my parents. Back then they were still handing out those awful cardboard glasses that you had to hold on with one hand during the film to stop them sliding off - and it wasn't even a film! We watched a series of still photos of historical New York. Many were taken from the top of sky scrapers and cranes so of course the 3D effect helped you feel the height a little bit more but it was all pretty dull.
Now suddenly this year everyone's been talking about Avatar and then it goes and wins a ton of oscars and I'm wondering if there's something I've missed. So I went to see Alice with an open mind yesterday.
The downsides first - of course it's more expensive, £9 at the Media Museum although the ticket seller was quick to tell me that most Imax's are £13 per full price adult. Still, you don't have to go to an Imax to see a 3D film. You do still have to wear the glasses though if you do go to an Imax, I soon discovered, but at least these days they're proper plastic ones and mine almost fitted well enough that I forgot I had them on.
The upsides - the film, of course had been made for 3D viewing and there were some great touches, if a little obviously laid on, like the March Hare's habit of throwing china right at you through the screen (actually made me flinch :). A number of times you watched Alice being chased from front on so that she was also running through the screen at you. Her fall through the rabit hole was pretty dramatic and any flying scene in 3D is always worth it's weight in extra entrance fees.
For those who've never experienced 3D, when you put the glasses on it's a little like you're suddenly watching a stage performance. Due to the added depth of the picture the action flows forward into the room as well as backwards behind the characters and there's less of a boundary between you and the picture. This definitely helps you to lose yourself in the action and adds to that suspension of disbelief feeling that we're all looking for when we go to see a film. I did find though, during the busiest action scenes that I actually got a bit dizzy and lost the thread a little, but maybe that's just me.
If you're expecting anything more dramatic and revolutionary than this though you'll be disappointed. It's good, but it's not all that. It adds to the general all round experience, as someone pointed out a bit like surround sound which we now take completely for granted; but are we going to simply expect it in future in the same way that we expect surround sound as an experience enhancer which we've got used to very quickly. Watching a film in 2D just won't cut it anymore, a bit like watching black and white when you're used to colour. I think it's quite likely that there'll be a generation of children who will grow up complaining that "2D is boring".
So does this mean that every film will have to include flying objects, chase scenes and heights, because one thing 3D can't do is enhance the plot? What about your ordinary romantic comedies, sure they don't need 3D but if everyone's doing it..? My question is, will the language of film, the way we read the screen change in order to allow for making the best of 3D? How about a film shot totally from a character's point of view? This isn't a new idea idea but it could work so much better in 3D. Maybe this time the revolution is really here. I just hope it means you can get your own glasses that actually fit!
Thursday, 18 March 2010
The Lovely Bones
I went to see this last Saturday. I don't often go to the cinema by myself but this was one occasion when I did and I think it was probably for the best. You also don't often get reviews of films that focus on the rating the film has been given, it's not usually very interesting but I think it's quite poignant in this case.
The Lovely Bones is rated 12A but I would strongly advise against letting your 12 year old or younger child see it, it's really quite disturbing. The plot follows the fictional - but obviously inspired by true stories - account of the last few days in the life of 1970s teenager Susie Salmon and then her abduction and murder by a neighbourhood serial killer, played creepily well by Stanley Tucci. However, Susie doesn't pass away never to be heard of again, she spends the next few years in the "In between" watching her family grieve and move on, and watching her killer as he prepares to strike again.
It's directed by Peter Jackson and there are some great sweeping fantasy landscapes in Susie's new world and beautiful special effects but that's where the Lord of The Rings comparisons end. Despite the fact that this is a fantasy film about a haunting it's incredibly real and totally chilling. Perhaps more so because it's a 12A and your expectations are innocent, you know you won't actually witness any violence but its what you don't see but know is going to happen that is so stomach churning.
With disarming honesty, Susie tells you in the first scene that she was raped and murdered in December 1973 and more disarmingly lets you join her as she follows her killer towards her death, and stay with her up until the final moments which seem to pass achingly slowly as you try your best not to shout out "run!" in the middle of the cinema. This would have been less upsetting had it been a reconstruction of a real life event, because of course no one can ever reconstruct those last few moments, you're forced to watch played out what is normally left to the imagination and watch the fear grow inside the victim as they realise their time is running out.
Jackson plays off the upsetting reality of the film against slightly confusing out of sequence wanderings in the epic and stunningly painted spirit world which comfortingly suits the childlike Susie better than the harsh world she's left behind. Look out for a change of scene for Mark Whalberg as Susie's dad. Rachel Weisz looks stunning as her mother, and Susan Sarandon is ageing disgracefully as her grandmother, if slightly wasted in a small role.
I haven't read the book on which this film is based so I'm sure there's things I'm missing here but a lot of the time the film seems to be making a comment on how life has changed since 1973, as Susie says "This was in the days before missing children used to appear on milk cartons" and on how careless we seemed then about our childrens' safety.
This film is well acted - Saoirse Ronan, the beautiful lead steals your heart from the first line - and very colourful - not least the funky 70s clothing, at times it's cute but don't be fooled it's bone chilling. I can't remember ever feeling as scared in the cinema as I did in parts of this. The final sad conclusion regarding Susie's remains reminds you just what you're dealing with here, 12A rating or not.
The Lovely Bones is rated 12A but I would strongly advise against letting your 12 year old or younger child see it, it's really quite disturbing. The plot follows the fictional - but obviously inspired by true stories - account of the last few days in the life of 1970s teenager Susie Salmon and then her abduction and murder by a neighbourhood serial killer, played creepily well by Stanley Tucci. However, Susie doesn't pass away never to be heard of again, she spends the next few years in the "In between" watching her family grieve and move on, and watching her killer as he prepares to strike again.
It's directed by Peter Jackson and there are some great sweeping fantasy landscapes in Susie's new world and beautiful special effects but that's where the Lord of The Rings comparisons end. Despite the fact that this is a fantasy film about a haunting it's incredibly real and totally chilling. Perhaps more so because it's a 12A and your expectations are innocent, you know you won't actually witness any violence but its what you don't see but know is going to happen that is so stomach churning.
With disarming honesty, Susie tells you in the first scene that she was raped and murdered in December 1973 and more disarmingly lets you join her as she follows her killer towards her death, and stay with her up until the final moments which seem to pass achingly slowly as you try your best not to shout out "run!" in the middle of the cinema. This would have been less upsetting had it been a reconstruction of a real life event, because of course no one can ever reconstruct those last few moments, you're forced to watch played out what is normally left to the imagination and watch the fear grow inside the victim as they realise their time is running out.
Jackson plays off the upsetting reality of the film against slightly confusing out of sequence wanderings in the epic and stunningly painted spirit world which comfortingly suits the childlike Susie better than the harsh world she's left behind. Look out for a change of scene for Mark Whalberg as Susie's dad. Rachel Weisz looks stunning as her mother, and Susan Sarandon is ageing disgracefully as her grandmother, if slightly wasted in a small role.
I haven't read the book on which this film is based so I'm sure there's things I'm missing here but a lot of the time the film seems to be making a comment on how life has changed since 1973, as Susie says "This was in the days before missing children used to appear on milk cartons" and on how careless we seemed then about our childrens' safety.
This film is well acted - Saoirse Ronan, the beautiful lead steals your heart from the first line - and very colourful - not least the funky 70s clothing, at times it's cute but don't be fooled it's bone chilling. I can't remember ever feeling as scared in the cinema as I did in parts of this. The final sad conclusion regarding Susie's remains reminds you just what you're dealing with here, 12A rating or not.
Monday, 22 February 2010
Tired again...but for good reason
This is of crew from Old Metal Things, a short I made a few years ago
I've had a manic couple of weeks - no time to write this but at least that means I now have something to write about :)
So we got a 4th housemate just after I updated last time. I'm getting used to the new dynamic especially the fact that his bedroom is the previously empty one next to mine and you can hear everything - I mean everything through that wall - or so he commented to me this evening. Although he followed that up by insisting I wasn't too noisy hmm...I hope the sound of tapping on a keyboard is not currently keeping him awake... Wait till I make a film!
During the last couple of weeks my prospective director, the only one I currently have went completely quiet on me. That was another reason for lack of blog, have been secretly worried that this whole thing will be over before it starts. Then this evening I finally got an email reply from her and it looks like we're back on track. Felt so brave I published my blog address on Facebook. I've also been to London on a free producing training course - yes free! So the UK Film Council had some money and they gave it to the regional screen agency and then the screen agency seem to like me so they gave some to me in the form of paying for me to go to London and have some training even though I'm not making one of their films this year. It would seem from that stroke of luck (and result of years of knocking on said screen agency door) that I'm surely meant to make a film some time soon - got to do something with what I learnt in 7 hours in a room in Soho.
So What Does a Producer do?
I was reminded to take the long view with my script, to think about the look of the film and how it will all come together - an integrated approach. I was also reminded to work out what my key cost is going to be and prioritise that in the budget. I spent a good hour listening to the others round the table talking about formats, work flow, data files and lenses and remembered how hopelessly un-technical I am and how this time I won't have a co-producer to help me out! Other fascinating subjects included, production insurance, wondering if my script needs a generator or a grip, bank accounts and what is a cost report? If you've ever wondered what a producer does there's a snippet. You're no wiser are you? Anyway producers love all this stuff, emphasis on all - we have to have a handle on just about everything.
Right now I'm waiting on my prospective director to tell me when my prospective DOP (director of photography) will be in the country with his camera (once again - Free! Producers love that word too) then I'll know when we can shoot. In the meantime I need to find at least another 2.5K of budget before we can even afford to shoot - that's probably the most important thing producers do - finding the money. At the moment I think I can lay my hands on about £900 only...
Oh yeah and I started my new job today. Really friendly people I think I'm going to like it mostly. I helped a client with hearing difficulties by talking to the UK border agency for him so he could get a loan and got a result. Not bad for a first day - and if I can get money for other people..!
My friend with the brain tuma gets his results this week. Hopefully see him on Sunday. I'm keeping my perspective.
I've had a manic couple of weeks - no time to write this but at least that means I now have something to write about :)
So we got a 4th housemate just after I updated last time. I'm getting used to the new dynamic especially the fact that his bedroom is the previously empty one next to mine and you can hear everything - I mean everything through that wall - or so he commented to me this evening. Although he followed that up by insisting I wasn't too noisy hmm...I hope the sound of tapping on a keyboard is not currently keeping him awake... Wait till I make a film!
During the last couple of weeks my prospective director, the only one I currently have went completely quiet on me. That was another reason for lack of blog, have been secretly worried that this whole thing will be over before it starts. Then this evening I finally got an email reply from her and it looks like we're back on track. Felt so brave I published my blog address on Facebook. I've also been to London on a free producing training course - yes free! So the UK Film Council had some money and they gave it to the regional screen agency and then the screen agency seem to like me so they gave some to me in the form of paying for me to go to London and have some training even though I'm not making one of their films this year. It would seem from that stroke of luck (and result of years of knocking on said screen agency door) that I'm surely meant to make a film some time soon - got to do something with what I learnt in 7 hours in a room in Soho.
So What Does a Producer do?
I was reminded to take the long view with my script, to think about the look of the film and how it will all come together - an integrated approach. I was also reminded to work out what my key cost is going to be and prioritise that in the budget. I spent a good hour listening to the others round the table talking about formats, work flow, data files and lenses and remembered how hopelessly un-technical I am and how this time I won't have a co-producer to help me out! Other fascinating subjects included, production insurance, wondering if my script needs a generator or a grip, bank accounts and what is a cost report? If you've ever wondered what a producer does there's a snippet. You're no wiser are you? Anyway producers love all this stuff, emphasis on all - we have to have a handle on just about everything.
Right now I'm waiting on my prospective director to tell me when my prospective DOP (director of photography) will be in the country with his camera (once again - Free! Producers love that word too) then I'll know when we can shoot. In the meantime I need to find at least another 2.5K of budget before we can even afford to shoot - that's probably the most important thing producers do - finding the money. At the moment I think I can lay my hands on about £900 only...
Oh yeah and I started my new job today. Really friendly people I think I'm going to like it mostly. I helped a client with hearing difficulties by talking to the UK border agency for him so he could get a loan and got a result. Not bad for a first day - and if I can get money for other people..!
My friend with the brain tuma gets his results this week. Hopefully see him on Sunday. I'm keeping my perspective.
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
And another one...
Very tired right now, probably should be writing this anothe time day and there'd be less typos to correct... a few things to update on though -
I got another job! Yes I have 2 now. This one is short term and involves working with kids in a theatre school and helping them generate script ideas for a short film. Looks like I've got the beginnings of my budget :)
On the same day I was offered this second job I also found out a friend has been diagnosed with a brain tuma. That was a strange day. I think he's going to be alright at least eventually. It seems as if the tuma is quite close to the surface of his head so there's a good chance they'll be able to operate and remove at least some of it. He hasn't even had a biopsy yet so there's every reason to be hopeful but it puts things in perspective.
I received my cheque today for attending a medical screening recently for possible admission for a clinical trial. I've been out of work for a while, need to live, need to make a film (need..?) and I just happened to come across an advert for what looked like a reputable company. Its strange though, despite knowing for years that this was how Robert Rodriguez financed his first feature film - which was a big hit etc etc - a year ago I never would have seen myself doing that. To be honest I didn't really see myself doing it now I was terrified. So what's happened to me? Of course I've been offered a job now, 2 jobs in fact so I called them and pulled out. It was as easy as that. My friend with the tuma on the other hand only gets 'day release' to go home and see his son at the moment. Another reason to be very glad I didn't go ahead with the study (beyond having blood taken from me every other day for 3 weeks). I swear from this day forward I'm going to stay out of hospitals as much as I can until I'm old and frail and getting my taxes worth out of the NHS. It's scary how easily we can lose our perspective.
I got another job! Yes I have 2 now. This one is short term and involves working with kids in a theatre school and helping them generate script ideas for a short film. Looks like I've got the beginnings of my budget :)
On the same day I was offered this second job I also found out a friend has been diagnosed with a brain tuma. That was a strange day. I think he's going to be alright at least eventually. It seems as if the tuma is quite close to the surface of his head so there's a good chance they'll be able to operate and remove at least some of it. He hasn't even had a biopsy yet so there's every reason to be hopeful but it puts things in perspective.
I received my cheque today for attending a medical screening recently for possible admission for a clinical trial. I've been out of work for a while, need to live, need to make a film (need..?) and I just happened to come across an advert for what looked like a reputable company. Its strange though, despite knowing for years that this was how Robert Rodriguez financed his first feature film - which was a big hit etc etc - a year ago I never would have seen myself doing that. To be honest I didn't really see myself doing it now I was terrified. So what's happened to me? Of course I've been offered a job now, 2 jobs in fact so I called them and pulled out. It was as easy as that. My friend with the tuma on the other hand only gets 'day release' to go home and see his son at the moment. Another reason to be very glad I didn't go ahead with the study (beyond having blood taken from me every other day for 3 weeks). I swear from this day forward I'm going to stay out of hospitals as much as I can until I'm old and frail and getting my taxes worth out of the NHS. It's scary how easily we can lose our perspective.
Thursday, 4 February 2010
New Job!!
Yay! I got a job today :) That should help things along a bit. I've been unemployed since the end of October after I resigned from the job I'd had for 3 months. Long story but it wasn't right - (nothing was right last year). I was working for a charity which is what I wanted to do and now I'm going to be working for another one, bonus! This time though it's only going to be part time. I was working full time before which maybe explained the 'long face' and eventual quitting and general all round misery. Now I get time to work on the fun stuff like making films. I can also afford to live, something important I've been prone to overlooking in the past. Just got to find the money for the film now...
Oh yeah - I'll be working for a charity in Leeds where I currently live that offers counselling for asylum seekers, could be a growth industry I think.
Oh yeah - I'll be working for a charity in Leeds where I currently live that offers counselling for asylum seekers, could be a growth industry I think.
Monday, 1 February 2010
New Month New Film?
I watched a series called 'Movie Virgins' when I was still at school. It was about two much older men trying to get their first feature films made and being partially successful I think. I don't remember much else but the title stayed with me. Now I'm much older and I haven't made my first feature film yet. That does mean I can legitimately use the title though, I am and will remain for now a movie virgin. I do however hope to become the Queen of Shorts when I attempt to make my first short film that's not funded by a university or regional screen agency. I'm going it alone, just me, a little bit of my own money and anyone who agrees to give me finance of course :)
It could be a while before the money starts rolling in and anything happens though so I might also use this blog as a space to practice writing film reviews. Just to keep you entertained. Should be off to the cinema this weekend so watch this space...
It could be a while before the money starts rolling in and anything happens though so I might also use this blog as a space to practice writing film reviews. Just to keep you entertained. Should be off to the cinema this weekend so watch this space...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
